Break away from traditional scaffolds with quick writes (post 1/3)

Some instructional approaches, including many traditional scaffolds, reinforce internalized and institutionalized racism and bias. Teacher-centered direct instruction can create relations that promote and rely on compliance, obedience and approval-seeking of a single arbitrary authority— and in a public school setting, this dynamic is often between a white teacher and students of color. In the multilingual classroom, teachers will often teach English vocabulary, grammar rules, or genre forms as something emergent bilinguals must adhere to and need to “get right” before they’re even permitted to innovate.

Or we are told to rely on scaffolds that shows a lack of confidence in the cognitive abilities of English language learners. Many scaffolds especially can create dependence and a type of learned helpless.

Instead, we need instructional approaches that teach the English language and genres as tools they can wield with as much power or more than a native speaker.

In wanting to dismantle these structures at our school, we upended the existing approach to ELA with a goal of transferring more decision-making power to students. First, we brought in a workshop model to reduce teacher talk time, shift teacher to coach focusing on student strengths, and increase student time to write.

This transition was not easy. Several teachers just didn’t think our students were capable and wanted to hold onto a teacher-centered approach with homogenized scaffolds and texts that were far far below grade level for all students — all of which serves to reinforce dependence on the teacher.

Here, I want to share an instructional strategy that has helped push us further. It comes primarily from books by Linda Rief, Rebekah O’Dell and Allison Marchetti. I highly recommend them as the place to go for understanding using quick writes and mentor texts, as this is intended to show how to do this in a class with multilingual learners.

Quick Writes

For students who often do not feel ownership over the English language yet, quick writes brought low stakes analysis, fun, and inspiration to writing that “free writing” (“How do I start?”) and teacher-created prompts just didn’t. But this didn’t come easily. Since we always want the students to dig into real writing immediately, and all have choice over topic and genre, studying a mentor text seemed impossible: How would we study so many? How would we choose the right mentors for all of them? 

How did we implement this with newcomers?

Inspired by research by Maren Aukerman, we structured the quick write lessons to emphasize student agency and discovery of their strengths. We wanted to teach genres as flexible tools that are created or chosen to serve their purpose and audience. I wanted them to value their voices first, then how to work with a genre.

The text we used would then get posted on Google Classroom and/or our wall (annotated) for students to access or for us to refer to during a conference.

1. Students inform/choose the quick write text: I encouraged students to share with me texts they liked. Some chose spoken word videos from YouTube, songs or inspirational quotes and memes. Starting with something from the students meant they all had a way in, even if it was to discuss why the student chose it. Using text with audio, music, or video meant there was typically support for interpreting the tone. If they didn’t choose, I selected texts that were in some way inspired by what I saw they were interested in, something that referenced an important topic in the news, or a text I knew they would relate to or be inspired by. 

2. Collaborative Annotations Protocol: When seeking inspiration from a text, the protocol was to choose anything — a word, a line, the tone, message, or topic — to get to writing (something I learned from Linda Rief’s text).  To get there, students followed a protocol that put collaboration first. Students are expected to learn from each other in all our core subjects, so some variation of this exists in all humanities classes.

After annotating, if there’s time, or in the following days, I would follow in with instruction digging into the techniques they noticed. We’d discuss what it did for us, what it seemed to be doing in the text, and then it became a reference point. (I also do this when teaching for the NYS ELA Regents exam & how to identify a message or technique in a text. I have students start with where the text drew them in or made them feel something and then see if they can identify how the author did it).

3. Letting Their Discovery Determine the Instruction: Their first exposure to any text is to first look at visuals/text features if there are any — basically things you can notice without reading. Typically, this means they notice things like varying sentence length, interesting structure or punctuation. (This was how I ended up doing a lesson on the structure and purpose of dialogue in narrative.) And this is done in small groups annotating collaboratively.

Then they write. I don’t have them share out noticings whole class yet for two reasons: One — what hit them about the text is freshest in their mind in that moment and I don’t want them to lose their inspiration. Two — if I’m talking, I’m forcing them to process more spoken English while their short term memory is working to hold onto and transfer what they just learned from their discussion, a tool I want them to value. This is also why they should feel free to write in whatever language comes to mind first — and this cannot be just a means to the English end; writing in whatever language they wish honors their bilingual identities and voices.

Sharing & Synthesis: Take Your Time

After they write for 5 or 10 or 15 minutes (be flexible because of time to process/work with multiple languages), they share what they wrote and what in the text inspired the writing.

As a discussion anchor, I annotate the parts they selected as they share. I can use it to plan a follow-up lesson for the next day or to help synthesize their learning as a class. (I can’t say I have the best method for this: sometimes I’d annotate the text in a different color per class section or save 4 separate annotated copies, depending on the amount of digging in we were doing).

The student writing in the image featured with this post used Good Bones by Maggie Smith as a mentor text.

Click here for post #2 on how we structure lessons and post 3 on how we selected texts. 

One thought on “Break away from traditional scaffolds with quick writes (post 1/3)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.